Statistics

 

Background

ITOPF maintains a database of oil spills from tankers, combined carriers and barges. This contains information on ACCIDENTAL spillages since 1970, except those resulting from acts of war.

The data held includes the type of oil spilt, the spill amount, the cause and location of the incident and the vessel involved. For historical reasons, spills are generally categorised by size:<7 tonnes, 7-700 tonnes and >700 tonnes (<50 bbls, 50-5,000 bbls, >5,000 bbls), although the actual amount spilt is also recorded. Information is now held on nearly 10,000 incidents, the vast majority of which (81%) fall into the smallest category i.e. <7 tonnes.

Information is gathered from both published sources, such as the shipping press and other specialist publications, and also from vessel owners and their insurers. Unsurprisingly, information from published sources generally relates to large spills, often resulting from collisions, groundings, structural damage, fires and explosions, whereas the majority of individual reports relate to small operational spillages. Complete reporting of this latter type of spill is clearly difficult to achieve.

It should be noted that the figures for the amount of oil spilt in an incident include all oil lost to the environment, including that which burnt or remained in a sunken vessel. There is considerable annual variation in both the incidence of oil spills and the amounts of oil lost. Whilst we strive to maintain precise records for all spill information, we cannot guarantee the information taken from shipping press and other sources is complete or accurate. Consequently, the figures in the following tables, and any averages derived from them should be viewed with an element of caution.

Download a formatted copy of the following information - ITOPF's Oil Tanker Spill Information Pack (1842Kb) - in Adobe Acrobat.

Return to top

Numbers and Amounts Spilt

Number of Oil Spills

The incidence of large spills is relatively low and detailed statistical analysis is rarely possible, consequently emphasis is placed on identifying trends. Thus, it is apparent from Table 1 that the number of large spills (>700 tonnes) has decreased significantly during the last 42 years during which records have been kept. The average number of major spills for the previous decade (2000-2009) is just over three, approximately eight times less than for the 1970s. Looking at this downward trend from another perspective, 55% of the large spills recorded occurred in the 1970s, and this percentage has decreased each decade to 7% in the 2000s (Figure 1).

A decline can also be observed with medium sized spills (7-700 tonnes) in Table 1. Here, the average number of spills in the 2000s was close to 15, whereas in the 1990s the average number of spills was almost double this number.

For 2011, one large spill was recorded (Figure 2 and Table 1). Four medium spills were also recorded in 2011, representing the lowest annual figure recorded for the second year in a row for this category. The total of all spills over 7 tonnes for 2011 is the lowest so far and is a significant reduction compared to the average for the previous decade.

Figure 1: Major spills as a percentage of those recorded from 1970 to 2009 per decade

 

Table 1: Number of spills over 7 tonnes
Show/Hide

 

Figure 2: Number of large spills (over 700 tonnes) from 1970 to 2011

 

Figure 3: Number of medium sized (7-700 tonnes) and large (>700 tonnes) spills per decade from 1970-2011

Return to top

Quantities of Oil Spilt

The vast majority of spills are small (i.e. less than 7 tonnes) and data on numbers and amounts is incomplete due to the inconsistent reporting of smaller incidents worldwide.

Reports on spills of 7 tonnes and above tend to be more reliable and information from these is included in the database to give a series of annual estimates of the total quantity spilt for the years 1970-2011. These amounts are rounded to the nearest thousand where practical.

Approximately 5.7 million tonnes of oil were lost as a result of tanker incidents from 1970 to 2011. However, as Figure 4 and 6 indicate, the volume of oil spilt from tankers demonstrates a significant improvement through the decades. Consistent with the reduction in the number of oil spills from tankers, the volume of oil spilt also shows a marked reduction. For instance, from Table 2 it is interesting to observe that an amount greater than the total quantity of oil spilt in the decade 2000 to 2009 (211,000 tonnes) was spilt in several single years in earlier decades.

The total amount of oil lost to the environment in 2011 is the lowest on record so far (Table 2 and Figure 4).

Table 2: Annual Quantity of Oil Spilt
Show/Hide

 

Figure 4: Quantities of oil spilt over 7 tonnes, 1970 to 2011

 

Figure 5: Spills over 7 tonnes per decade showing the influence of a relatively small number of comparatively large spills on the overall figure

 

As demonstrated in Figure 5, when looking at the frequency and quantities of oil spilt, it should be noted that a few very large spills are responsible for a high percentage of oil spilt. For example, in more recent decades the following can be seen:

• In the 1990s there were 361 spills over 7 tonnes, resulting in 1,137,000 tonnes of oil lost; 73% of this amount was spilt in just 10 incidents.
• In the 2000s there were 181 spills over 7 tonnes, resulting in 210,000 tonnes of oil lost; 44% of this amount was spilt in just 2 incidents.

The figures for a particular year may therefore be severely distorted by a single large incident. This is clearly illustrated by incidents such as ATLANTIC EMPRESS (1979), 287,000 tonnes spilt; CASTILLO DE BELLVER (1983), 252,000 tonnes spilt and ABT SUMMER (1991), 260,000 tonnes spilt.

Figure 6: Oil spilt per decade from 1970 to 2009 (excluding 2010-2011) as a percentage of the total spilt

Return to top

Major Oil Spills

Table 3 below gives a brief summary of 20 major oil spills since 1967. The map in Figure 7 shows where they occurred. A number of these incidents, despite their large size, caused little or no environmental damage as the oil was spilt some distance offshore and did not impact coastlines. It is for this reason that some of the names listed may be unfamiliar. EXXON VALDEZ is included for comparison although this incident falls some way outside the group.

Position Shipname Year Location Spill Size
(tonnes)
1 Atlantic Empress 1979 Off Tobago, West Indies 287,000
2 ABT Summer 1991 700 nautical miles off Angola 260,000
3 Castillo de Bellver 1983 Off Saldanha Bay, South Africa 252,000
4 Amoco Cadiz 1978 Off Brittany, France 223,000
5 Haven 1991 Genoa, Italy 144,000
6 Odyssey 1988 700 nautical miles off Nova Scotia, Canada 132,000
7 Torrey Canyon 1967 Scilly Isles, UK 119,000
8 Sea Star 1972 Gulf of Oman 115,000
9 Irenes Serenade 1980 Navarino Bay, Greece 100,000
10 Urquiola 1976 La Coruna, Spain 100,000
11 Hawaiian Patriot 1977 300 nautical miles off Honolulu 95,000
12 Independenta 1979 Bosphorus, Turkey 95,000
13 Jakob Maersk 1975 Oporto, Portugal 88,000
14 Braer 1993 Shetland Islands, UK 85,000
15 Khark 5 1989 120 nautical miles off Atlantic coast of Morocco 80,000
16 Aegean Sea 1992 La Coruna, Spain 74,000
17 Sea Empress 1996 Milford Haven, UK 72,000
18 Nova 1985 Off Kharg Island, Gulf of Iran 70,000
19 Katina P 1992 Off Maputo, Mozambique 66,700
20 Prestige 2002 Off Galicia, Spain 63,000
35 Exxon Valdez 1989 Prince William Sound, Alaska, USA 37,000

Table 3: Major oil spills Since 1967

 

Figure 7: Location of major spills (click map to view larger version in PDF format)

Return to top

Seaborne Oil Trade

Apart from a fall in the early 1980s during the worldwide economic recession, seaborne oil trade has grown steadily from 1970 (Figure 8). While increased movements might imply increased risk, it is encouraging to observe however that downward trends in oil spills continue despite an overall increase in oil trading over the period.

Figure 8: Seaborne oil trade and number of tanker spills over 7 tonnes, 1970-2011

(crude and oil product*)

*Product vessels of 60,000 DWT and above

 

Return to top

Causes of Spills

The causes and circumstances of oil spills are varied, but can have a significant effect on the final quantity spilt. The following analysis explores the incidence of spills of different sizes in terms of the operation that the vessel was undertaking at the time of the incident and the primary cause of the spill. For small and medium sized spills operations have been grouped into Loading/Discharging, Bunkering, Other Operations and Unknown Operations. Other Operations includes activities such as ballasting, de-ballasting, tank cleaning and when the vessel is en route.

Reporting of larger spills tends to provide much more information and accuracy, which has allowed further breakdown of vessel operations. Therefore, operations for larger spills have been grouped into Loading/Discharging, Bunkering, At Anchor (Inland/Restricted waters), At Anchor (Open water), Underway (Open water), Underway (Inland/Restricted waters), Other Operations and Unknown Operations. The primary causes have been designated to Allisions/Collisions, Groundings, Hull Failures, Equipment Failures, Fire and Explosion, and Other/Unknown. Other causes include events such as heavy weather damage and human error. Spills where the relevant information is not available have been designated as Unknown.

Small and medium sized spills account for 95% of all the incidents recorded; a large percentage of these spills, 40% and 29% respectively, occurred during loading and discharging operations which normally take place in ports and oil terminals (Figures 9 and 12). While the cause of these spills is largely unknown it can be seen that equipment and hull failures account for approximately 46% of these incidents for both size categories (Figures 11 and 14) . Nevertheless, there is a significant difference in the percentage of allisions, collisions and groundings between these two size groups where we see the percentage increasing from 2% for smaller spills to 35% for medium spills (Figure 14).

Large spills account for the remaining 5% of all the incidents recorded and the occurrence of these incidents has significantly decreased over the past 42 years. From Figure 15, it can be seen that 50% of large spills occurred while the vessels were underway in open water; allisions, collisions and groundings accounted for 58% of the causes for these spills (Figure 17). These same causes account for an even higher percentage of incidents when the vessel was underway in inland or restricted waters, being linked to some 95% of spills.

Perhaps unsurprisingly activities during loading or discharging result in significantly more small or medium sized spills than large spills. However, large spills do still occur during loading and discharging, and from Figure 17 and Table 6, it can be seen that 61% of these incidents are caused by fires, explosions and equipment failures.


Return to top

Figure 9: Incidence of spills <7 tonnes by operation at time of incident, 1974-2011

 

Figure 10: Incidence of spills <7 tonnes by cause, 1974-2011

 

Figure 11: Incidence of spills <7 tonnes by operation at time of incident and primary cause of spill, 1974-2011

 

Operations

Loading/

Discharging

Bunkering Other Operations Unknown
3156
563
1270
2852
Causes
Collisions
1
2
11
168
Groundings
2
0
9
228
Hull failures
324
10
47
196
Equipment failures
1123
104
250
202
Fires/Explosions
50
5
34
84
Other/Unknown
1656
442
919
1974
Total
3156
563
1270
2852


Table 4: Incidence of spills <7 tonnes by operation at time of incident and primary cause of spill, 1974-2011


Return to top

Figure 12: Incidence of spills 7-700 tonnes by operation at time of incident, 1970-2011

 

Figure 13: Incidence of spills 7-700 tonnes by cause, 1970-2011

 

Figure 14: Incidence of spills 7-700 tonnes by operation at time of incident and primary cause of spill, 1970-2011

 

Operations

Loading/

Discharging

Bunkering Other Operations Unknown
388
33
136
785
Causes
Collisions
4
0
32
308
Groundings
0
0
16
253
Hull failures
36
4
10
50
Equipment failures
141
6
17
38
Fires/Explosions
8
0
13
26
Other/Unknown
199
23
48
110
Total
388
33
136
785

Table 5: Incidence of spills 7-700 tonnes by operation at time of incident and primary cause of spill, 1970-2011

Return to top

Figure 15: Incidence of spills >700 tonnes by operation at time of incident, 1970-2011

 

Figure 16: Incidence of spills >700 tonnes by cause, 1970-2011

 

Figure 17: Incidence of spills >700 tonnes by operation at time of incident and primary cause of spill, 1970-2011. (One bunkering incident occurred in this size category but has not been included in the graph)

 

Operations
At anchor (Inland/Restricted) At anchor
(Open Water)
Underway
(Inland/Restricted)
Underway
(Open Water)
13
9
82
225
Causes

Allisions/

Collisions

6
5
33
65
Groundings
4
2
45
66
Hull failures
0
1
0
50
Equipment failures
0
0
0
7
Fires/Explosions
1
1
3
25
Other/Unknown
2
0
1
12
Total
13
9
82
225

 

Operations cont...

Loading/

discharging

Bunkering Other operations/unknown
41
1
83
Causes

Allisions/

Collisions

1
0
24
Groundings
2
0
29
Hull failures
0
0
8
Equipment failures
11
0
1
Fires/Explosions
14
1
9
Other/Unknown
13
0
12
Total
41
1
83

Table 6: Incidence of spills >700 tonnes by operation at time of incident and primary cause of spill, 1970-2011

 

Further information is available in:

Trends in Oil Spills from Tanker Ships 1995-2004 (2005) [603kb]

by Keisha Huijer
Paper presented at the 28th Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program (AMOP) Technical Seminar, 7-9 June 2005, Calgary, Canada

Return to top